Stellantis unit FCA US agrees to a $4.2 million settlement to resolve a California emissions probe, addressing air quality violations involving Ram ProMaster diesel vehicles.
Stellantis unit FCA US has agreed to pay $4.2 million to settle a California emissions probe by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), the state announced on Monday. The settlement addresses violations tied to excess nitrogen oxide emissions from diesel-powered Ram ProMaster vehicles, emphasizing California’s commitment to strict air quality standards.
Details of the Emissions Probe
The CARB investigation focused on 2014-2016 Ram ProMaster 1500, 2500, and 3500 vehicles equipped with 3.0L diesel engines. According to the board, these vehicles were equipped with an unapproved device that circumvented emissions control systems. As a result, nearly 55 tons of excess nitrogen oxides were released into the air.
Nitrogen oxides are harmful pollutants that contribute to smog formation and respiratory issues, making them a key target of California’s emissions regulations. Addressing these violations, Stellantis has agreed to recall the affected vehicles and modify their emissions control systems to comply with the state’s standards.
Financial Breakdown of the Settlement
The $4.2 million settlement includes:
- Civil Penalty: Over $2 million will go to California’s Air Pollution Control Fund, which supports initiatives to improve air quality across the state.
- Environmental Projects: $2.1 million will be allocated to a program incentivizing ocean-going cargo vessels to reduce their speeds during peak whale and ozone seasons. This innovative approach aims to improve air quality and protect marine wildlife simultaneously.
These actions highlight California’s dedication to holding automakers accountable for emissions violations while funding projects with dual environmental and ecological benefits.
Stellantis’ History of Emissions Compliance Issues
This settlement is the latest in a series of emissions-related legal challenges for Stellantis and its subsidiaries. In 2022, FCA US pleaded guilty to criminal conspiracy as part of a federal emissions probe by the U.S. Justice Department. The investigation, which involved diesel emissions fraud, resulted in a $300 million plea agreement.
Earlier, in 2019, FCA US faced accusations of using “defeat device software” to circumvent emissions testing. This led to a $500 million settlement, with California receiving $78 million. These cases underscore the ongoing challenges automakers face in adhering to emissions standards and the high stakes of non-compliance.
The Broader Implications of Emissions Probes
Emissions probes like the one conducted by CARB are essential for ensuring that automakers comply with environmental regulations. Excess nitrogen oxides not only harm public health but also contribute to broader environmental degradation.
California, known for its aggressive stance on air quality, sets an example for other states and countries by holding companies accountable for violations. By using settlement funds to address both air quality and marine life protection, the state demonstrates an innovative approach to solving interconnected environmental challenges.
Environmental and Legal Ramifications
The settlement is not just a financial penalty but also a wake-up call for automakers. It signals that cutting corners on emissions compliance will lead to significant legal and financial repercussions. Automakers must prioritize transparency, compliance, and investment in cleaner technologies to avoid such penalties in the future.
Additionally, initiatives like the cargo vessel speed reduction program show how emissions-related penalties can create positive environmental impacts. By incentivizing eco-friendly practices, California leverages legal settlements to drive meaningful change.
Conclusion
The $4.2 million California emissions probe settlement underscores the importance of adhering to environmental regulations. Stellantis has taken steps to address the violations, including vehicle recalls and funding air quality improvement projects. However, the company’s history of non-compliance highlights the need for continued oversight and stricter industry standards.
As automakers navigate increasingly stringent emissions regulations, this case serves as a reminder of the legal and reputational risks of non-compliance. For California, the settlement represents another victory in its fight to protect air quality and public health.
Stellantis has not yet issued a statement regarding the settlement.